Survey Technical Information

Select a country from the list to see the technical information:

  • Ghana (2009)

    Principal investigator(s):
    Joachim Bruess, Aylin Talgar (InterMedia)

    Data Collection Organization:

    Survey Period: Jul-14-2009 to Aug-10-2009

    Sample:
    Sampling frame: 2000 census
    Sample design: Nationally representative, stratified design,
    PSU selection: Probability proportional to size
    Household selection: Random walk procedure, interviews at every fifth dwelling for high density areas, every third dwelling for low density areas.

    Universe:
    Both sexes, 15 and more years

    Survey procedure:
    Personal Face to Face Interview

    Sample size:2051

    Estimated Error:+/- 2.2% with a 95% confidence interval

    Response rate:
    78% of valid contacts

    Weighting:
    Region and urban/rural location

  • Kenya (2009)

    Principal investigator(s):
    Joachim Bruess, Klara Debeljak (InterMedia)

    Data Collection Organization:

    Survey Period: Jul-20-2009 to Aug-11-2009

    Sample:
    Sampling frame: 1999 Census
    Sample design: Nationally representative, stratified design
    PSU selection: Probability proportional to size
    Household selection: Random walk procedure; Kish grid at the household level
    Median interview time: 55 minutes

    Universe:
    Both sexes, 15 and more years

    Survey procedure:
    Personal Face to Face Interview

    Sample size:2051

    Estimated Error:+/- 2.2% with a 95% confidence interval

    Response rate:
    84% of valid contacts

    Weighting:
    Sex, age and religion

  • Tanzania (2010)

    Principal investigator(s):
    Joachim Bruess, Klara Debeljak (InterMedia)

    Data Collection Organization:
    Synovate Pan Africa

    Survey Period: Jul-12-2008 to Jul-30-2010

    Sample:
    Sampling frame: 2002 census, carried out in 22 regions of Tanzania. The target population at 2009 was projected to be 23.3 million, with a 48% : 52% Male : Female ratio and a 29% : 71%
    Urban : Rural ratio

    Sample design: Nationally representative, stratified multistage (5-stages) cluster method

    PSU selection: The basic unit available from the report was at Ward level. The wards were defined as the primary sampling units (PSUs), since they are the smallest well-defined geographical units for which population and household data are available from the published report available to the public

    Household selection: Households were selected using the ‘left hand rule’ selection methodology, starting from a fixed landmark in each sampling point, using the date to determine the starting house.

    Respondent Selection: Where there was more than one eligible respondent in the household, the random selection procedure known as the Kish Grid was used to select the respondent to be interviewed.

    Universe:
    Both sexes, 15 and more years

    Survey procedure: Individual face to face Interview

    Sample size: 2000, of which 1,425 are rural and 575 are urban, distributed using Probability Proportionate to Population Size (PPPS) across the regions

    Estimated Error: +/-2.2% at 95% confidence level at the national level. It should be noted that the degree of precision will vary (i.e. be higher than +/-2.2%) at the urban and rural levels

    Response rate: 53.79%

    Weighting – Age Group and Gender

    Universe:
    Both sexes, 15 and more years

    Survey procedure:
    Personal Face to Face Interview

    Sample size:1566

  • Zambia (2010)

    Principal investigator(s):
    Joachim Bruess, Klara Debeljak (InterMedia)

    Data Collection Organization:
    TNS

    Survey Period: Apr-13-2010 to May-11-2010

    Sample:
    Sampling Frame: 2000 Zambian National Census

    Sampling Design: Nationally representative, stratified design; wards as sampling points, average 10 interviews per sampling point

    PSU selection: Probability proportional to size

    Household selection: Random walk procedure; Kish grid at household level

    Median interview time: 90 minutes

    Universe:
    Both sexes, 15 and more years

    Survey procedure:
    Personal Face to Face Interview

    Sample size:2000

    Estimated Error:+/-2.2% with a 95% confidence interval

    Response rate:
    92.5% of valid contacts

    Weighting:
    Rural/urban location; Age groups